From the record on section 497 the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) robbery and bail bail, any hostility between the accused and the complainant. The refusal was out of the question regarding making false accusations to the accused, the suspect was identified during the parade motorcycle, mobile, etc., when he was stripped by force, especially by showing the pistol to the complainant, it was not It may be said that the Section 17 (3) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance, related to harassment in 1979, invalidated the police's identification parade. The situation was controversial, witnessing in this regard at the bailout stage, delay of any party did not result in prejudice as there could be no cause for delay in the matter. Even if no one is entitled to a discount on the guarantee on qualification, filing an F will be a mere delay. The IR will not create a basis for bail, temporary review of the material on record, the accused was fully involved in the alleged commission of the crime, the material submitted by the trial court grant was properly appreciated or The bail was denied when the matter was at the discretion of the court. Used appropriately, under the parameters set by the law and approved by the superior courts, the courts were reluctant to interfere with such arbitrary order, in which case the request for bail was dismissed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
