Find a Lawyer

ADNAN TRADING COMPANY versus APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX

Article 185 (2) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R 19 Appeal, Appeal for restitution of non-prosecution was dismissed by the High Court for non-prosecution immunity and reinstated on grounds of invalidity. Was not done Appellant's Validation Rehabilitation rehabilitation depended on the good and good cause of Appellant's absence. The High Court's decision made no exception to the Supreme Court under which it refused to exercise its discretion in favor of the appellant for the absence of any good. The use of discretion by the High Court was neither arbitrary nor erroneous appeal was dismissed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• State v. UMER HAYAT 2011 SCMR 1527
• MUKHTAR AHMAD v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE 2011 SCMR 1531
• SOHAIL KHAN v. AFZAL HUSSAIN 2011 SCMR 1532
• MUHAMMAD AZEEM v. State 2011 SCMR 1533
• YAR MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1537
• IJAZ alias JAJU v. State 2011 SCMR 1540
• SUBEH SADIQ alias SAABO alias KALU v. State 2011 SCMR 1543
• GHAFOOR KHAN v. ISRAR AHMED 2011 SCMR 1545

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Punch lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes