Find a Lawyer

IJAZ ALIAS JAJU versus STATE

Section 10 (3) of the Contempt of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), Section 337 L (2) of Zina Bill's repression, the Constitution struck Pakistan, Article 203F (2B) trial court did not view any significant piece of evidence or Was not neglected, certain points of law were pointed out by the accused that he escaped the notice of both the courts so that the evidence could not be assessed that the Federal Shariat Court rightly rejected the accused's appeal. Even if it was acknowledged within 409 days of delay in filing the present application. There was nothing else on the record that had the larger interests of justice that needed re-examination of any evidence or sought to consider any new points that appeared in the documents presented by the defense lawyer, The leave of appeal was denied by the Supreme Court,

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SOHAIL KHAN v. AFZAL HUSSAIN 2011 SCMR 1532
• MUHAMMAD AZEEM v. State 2011 SCMR 1533
• ADNAN TRADING COMPANY v. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX 2011 SCMR 1535
• YAR MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1537
• SUBEH SADIQ alias SAABO alias KALU v. State 2011 SCMR 1543
• GHAFOOR KHAN v. ISRAR AHMED 2011 SCMR 1545
• KHALID UMAR v. Syed ATHAR IQBAL, CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT PROMOTERS 2011 SCMR 1555
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2011 SCMR 1557

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Kacha Khooh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes