Find a Lawyer

KHALID UMAR versus SYED ATHAR IQBAL, CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT PROMOTERS

Sections 205 and 512 Personal Attendance, with Plaintiff's felony conviction raised by the accused by his lawyer, meant that he was trapped in a foreign country because of a visa problem, therefore, his personal attendance was valid. Should have been sent to the audience, usually he had no right of audience but in the specific circumstances of this case and given the state's fair and equitable stand, the Supreme Court ordered the accused to submit two bail to the trial court. Instructed. Bail bonds were allowed to be seized

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• YAR MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1537
• IJAZ alias JAJU v. State 2011 SCMR 1540
• SUBEH SADIQ alias SAABO alias KALU v. State 2011 SCMR 1543
• GHAFOOR KHAN v. ISRAR AHMED 2011 SCMR 1545
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2011 SCMR 1557
• Meter NOOR MUHAMMAD v. NAZIR AHMED 2011 SCMR 1559
• Dr. MUHAMMAD ANWAR KURD v. THE STATE through Regional Accountability Bureau, Quetta 2011 SCMR 1560
• SILK BANK LIMITED v. Qazi EHTISHAMUL HAQ 2011 CLD 1569

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

famous lower court advocate from Ranipur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes