DR. MUHAMMAD ANWAR KURD versus THE STATE THROUGH REGIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, QUETTA
On the basis of Section 15 and Article 15 of the National Accountability Ordinance, those charged with imposing the full bargaining charge were banned and sentenced, on the basis of the accused. Tried to separate the sentence that they did not know about such punishment. The time to enter plea bargaining was not available when the National Accountability Ordinance was valid in 1999, at the time of entering into the accountability court and accepting the plea deal, the accused, who was otherwise well-educated. , Was well aware / aware of its legal consequences for being convicted and disqualified, as imposed by the Accountability Court, which was based on the latest amendment to the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 Was not entitled to any kind of relaxation in the matter of exemplary punishment or disqualification. Such steps would be detrimental to the mandate of the relevant amended law against public policy, and also to those who were found guilty of bargaining on their plea, to the risk of further irregularities / The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the conviction under Section 15 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999, the appeal was dismissed by the trial court of the accused at the time of their plea agreement.
