Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SIALKOT


Section 2 (d) and Schedule Item No. 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Art 185 (3) Case for Recovering Dubai Articles by Wife, Applicant (Father, Brother and Mother) on behalf of Father, Brother and Husband Mother Was not objected to in practice, in his written statement before the Family Court or in his appeal before the First Appellate Court or in the constitutional petition before the High Court before the question of jurisdiction of the Family Court was not raised. That any one of the courts and the applicants fully participated in it. At the trial, his appeal was filed and then a constitutional application in the High Court petitioners, in the circumstances, refuses to make such a claim (objection to the claim) before the Supreme Court's appeal for appeal for the first time. Done.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.