Sections 302 (b), 309, 310 and 311 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 345 (5) Qatel Amad (Double Murder Case) Fod File Arrivals, Principles of Applicable Punishment, Conviction On the small matter, two persons were sentenced to death by the trial court and sentenced to death, which the High Court had filed before the Supreme Court's accused while retaining the appeal as it sought the legality of the accused. Had compromised with the heritage. The decease was to be treated with the deceased with whom he had first exchanged warm words, then the death of the other deceased may have occurred during a dispute between the two, apparently because the accused was fleeing from his life. If he was apprehended by the complaining party, he would not be forgiven because he had already killed one person. The Supreme Court ruled that the incident was cruel or intimidating or shocking to maintain the death sentence, especially when it compromised the legal heirs of the deceased, something available on record. The accused did not have any criminal record. The Supreme Court rejected the plea and the plea agreement and the accused was convicted and the death sentence was changed. Life imprisonment
