Schedule Classes 6, 7 and 10 of the West Pakistan Congo Services (Northern Zone) Rules, 1964 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Article 212 (3) of the Appellant Patwari's Promotion on the 4 4 1990 Promoted After qualifying the Konongo Department Examination, the competent respondent Patwari's Department of Appeal, in the absence of such examination, directs the matter to be placed before the Public Promotion Committee by the Board of Revenue, such committee According to the order dated 3 2 2005, pharma promotion has been recommended to the respondents. In 1990, the service tribunal filed an appeal against defendant's publicity. Passing such a test with successful exams was approved as a similar training, but it was not just that the respondent did not pass such an exam, therefore, on this issue Not considered: During the five years from 1990 to 1995, the committee did not challenge the respondents' proceedings of the committee during the five years. The respondents did not challenge the Congo's seniority list based on the recommendations of such committee. What was, the respondent could not be approved for pharma promotion because of the seniority list not being challenged by him. The final position was obtained by amending Notification No. SOR II 1 15/93 of the Punjab Revenue (Revenue Administration Posts) Rules, 1990, from Center No. 1 in Column No. 10 of Schedule 25, 1994 The deletion of admissions in Act 3 was actually eliminated for the purpose of passing such an examination for promotion purposes, but such a condition remained in place for confirmation by Kanongo.