EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), DISTRICT KHUSHAB AT JAUHARABAD versus IJAZ HUSSAIN
Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Regulations of Services) Rules, 1974, R17 Constitution of Pakistan, Prior Recruitment, Policy Matters, Academic Qualifications and Interview Signs Ratio Failed to select respondents for tracheotomy of power scope. On the selection that the recruitment policy was defective because it had reserved 60% for academic qualification and 40% for the interview, under the constitutional jurisdiction, the provincial government was directed to amend the recruitment policy and interviewed. The number should not exceed 25%. Authorities pleaded that the High Court could not issue instructions for amending the recruitment policy because such power had come under the jurisdiction of the executive authority's policymaking, prompting the provincial government to adopt the proposed legislative policy. Was created as a section and cannot be provisioned. The possibility of being irresponsible or misused by the vague reservations of existence was a possibility that those who exercised such powers would perform it well and if they used such power in a good way. If done, it was especially the Malad function that could be challenged and the provisions abolished. Unconstitutional, fundamental rights may not be violated or unreasonable because it can be misused because if any part of the law can be misused, it will have the power to create a policy and rules of recruitment, The constitution in the executive domain was based on the principle of a tracheotomy of powers where the legislature was entrusted with the duties of the legislature, its implementation and
