Find a Lawyer

SHAHNAZ PARVEEN versus PTCL THROUGH PRESIDENT

Sections 46 and 47 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) option of voluntary separation scheme The applicant exercised his option for the voluntary separation scheme offered by the administration which the management accepted The applicant later requested that a fraud was carried out. Otherwise she would not exercise her option had the Labor Court dismissed the petitioner's complaint and the appeal was also rejected by the applicant whether the applicant's use of the option was voluntary or Otherwise, the decision could not be made by him. As a question to the Supreme Court purely a dispute was already resolved by the Labor Court as well as the High Court, there was no question of the law of public importance in this matter. It was too late to entertain and decide on the petition granted by the applicant but without the submission of any material to reject the application for autonomy without exception, the leave of appeal was denied. Was

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• PAKISTAN RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL BRANCH v. ZIA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI 2011 SCMR 1901
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 2011 SCMR 1906
• Syed TAHIR ABBAS SHAH v. OGDCL through M.D. Head Office, Islamabad 2011 SCMR 1912
• ASIF RAZA MIR v. MUHAMMAD KHURSHID KHAN 2011 SCMR 1917
• MUKHTAR HUSSAIN v. SOHBAT ALI 2011 SCMR 1926
• AZMATULLAH v. State 2011 SCMR 1935
• Rana SHAHID AHMAD KHAN v. TANVEER AHMED 2011 SCMR 1937
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2011 SCMR 1943

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

us immigration advocates from Ghari Dupatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes