Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 166 Delay in dispatch of evidence of drug recovery Weight of 97 min (3880kg) from second police post (post straw), loaded in 112 nylon and during raid A jute sack of 16 jute was recovered, of which 500 grams were separated as a sample which the Chemical Examiner Trial Court found guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment, which was passed by High Court Correctional Officers (Anti. Maintained by the Narcotics Force). Long before the raid, he had obtained spy information about the drugs and had received enough information from the concerned police station on his information, the officers conducted the raid, allegedly recovered, and more than ten hours later the relevant. A report has been filed in the police station. He remained in custody for more than ten hours without any explanation by the police party and raised suspicion of supporters. In addition to the complaint of the securities case, the recovery memo also stated that the post (postal racket) 112 Nylon and 16 paten (jute) sacks were recovered, but the recovery memo does not mention that the recovered items were grilled or mixed and then sent to Chemical Examiner contents. The Chemical Examiner's report states that the sample taken from the recovered articles (skin tone and straw) was "crushed" and, therefore, they were not illegitimate articles, which were recovered. Cannot attribute The accused Supreme Court set aside the conviction and sentence given to the accused as the prosecution failed to prove his case App r \ n
