Find a Lawyer

GUL DIN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan, Section 185 (3) Disturbances with deadly weapons and deadly weapons; There was a free fight in which the participants of both groups were injured. The accused was not attributed to any particular character, and by supplemental statement the complainant alleges that the fatal injury was inflicted by the accused. The response version was not guaranteed by the Supreme Court and the incident was not pre-meditated and it was a matter of further investigation and a bail was allowed in the inquiry.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. NATIONAL REFINERY 2011 SCMR 1986
• CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AMAF 2011 SCMR 1988
• FIDA HUSSAIN v. Mst. SAIQA 2011 SCMR 1990
• Syed ALI ABBAS v. State 2011 SCMR 1994
• MAZHAR HUSSAIN v. GENERAL MANAGER OPERATIONS, RAILWAY HEADQUARTERS 2011 SCMR 1999
• CHAIRMAN, WAPDA v. Syed MUBARAK ALI ZAIDI 2011 SCMR 2001
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2011 SCMR 2002
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL, KARACHI 2011 PTD 2220

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Kasur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes