Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, WAPDA versus SYED MUBARAK ALI ZAIDI

Rules 2 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) The medical treatment of a permanently disabled son of WAPDA employees was the legal responsibility of WAPDA officials, regardless of the age of the WAPDA employees or retired employees with disabilities. Let there be no weakness. Or the Appeal Court order below the legal opposition, the leave application for appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• FIDA HUSSAIN v. Mst. SAIQA 2011 SCMR 1990
• Syed ALI ABBAS v. State 2011 SCMR 1994
• GUL DIN v. State 2011 SCMR 1997
• MAZHAR HUSSAIN v. GENERAL MANAGER OPERATIONS, RAILWAY HEADQUARTERS 2011 SCMR 1999
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2011 SCMR 2002
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL, KARACHI 2011 PTD 2220
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX 2011 PTD 2251
• MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN v. State 2011 SCMR 45

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

us immigration advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes