Section 23 Punjab Judicial Service Rules, 1994, R7 (1) (a) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Section 26 Sindh Judicial Service Rules, 1994, R8 (1) (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 185 (3) Appointment of Judicial Officers Two years Pre-condition of practice of law Proper classification, Applicable principle Petitioner suspended the provisions of R 7 (1) (a) of Punjab Judicial Service Rules 1994, whereby two two The state of the year was a practice of law. It has been compulsory for any candidate to be appointed a Judicial Officer, it was submitted by the petitioner that the Shariah discrimination imposed by the Punjab Government was because the Sindh Judicial Service Rules (R8 of 1994) (1) (B) Under the Government of Sindh, no such condition was required. The Government of Sindh constituted the Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994 and exercised its powers under section 26 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, while the Punjab Judicial Services Rules, 1994, were formulated by the Governor Punjab under section 23 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act. , 1974 Applicable rules were enforced in two provinces under two different laws, and given the specific circumstances of each province, the rules made in one province may not apply to another province unless adopted and Applicants fail to mention any such order in relation to the rule. The rational classification or distinction was not misinterpreted or misinterpreted because in Article 25 of the Constitution no reasonable classification was prohibited in relation to the practice of law, the provision of Sindh Judicial Service Rules 1994 did not apply in Punjab. Could have been done. The High Court's decision to grant leave to appeal was denied.
