Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Section 3, 5 and 19 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3), dismissed by the Applicant's Appeal Service Tribunal against the imposition of a large penalty for discharge from service. Was gone After the statute of limitations has expired, the applicant has claimed that he has filed an appeal through the registered post confession after the statute of limitations. The applicant did not present a postal or confessional proof in the evidence of his claim which was necessary for a fair decision. The dispute resolution issue between the parties was turned over to the appeal of the petition and the question involved in the matter was remanded to the service tribunal to decide on the documents and material presented by the parties within a period of three months.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2011 PLC(CS) 683
• PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, N.-W.F.P. v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2011 SCMR 689
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, F.B.R. v. MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, KARACHI 2011 PTD 690
• A.R. AWAN v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2011 SCMR 691
• NAZIR AHMED v. CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 694
• SOHAIL BUTT v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (NORTH) NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND MOTORWAY POLICE 2011 SCMR 698
• JAHANGIR SARWAR v. LAHORE HIGH COURT 2011 PLC(CS) 704
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 705

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

when you need a advocate from Utror lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes