ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, FORMER JUDGE/CJP versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN/STATE
Sections 5 (2) and 19 intra-court of intra-court appealed to the Supreme Court, PLD 2009 SC-879 in its decision in the Sindh High Court Bar Association case against Mr Justice (R) Abdul Hameed Dogar against the decision. Was declared in violation. The seven-member bench of the Supreme Court was never the Constitution of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and all appointments made by judges in consultation were declared unconstitutional, after which Mr Justice (Retd) was sentenced to contempt of court. Notices were issued. ) Abdul Hameed Dogar and others, who contested and finally the Supreme Court Bench decided to prosecute him against the contempt of court lawyer for Mr. Justice (R) Abdul Hameed Dogar, who said he had already retired. Are. He is no longer a Supreme Court judge. He was not enjoying good health and expressed regret and regret that he could not comply with the order of the seven member bench of the Supreme Court under confusion, misunderstanding and misunderstanding. He kept himself at the mercy of mercy. The Supreme Court can, therefore, accept his contempt and his appeal can be dealt with. Accordingly, the Attorney General for Pakistan said that Mr Justice (retd) Abdul Hameed Dogar kept himself at the mercy of the court. Was, so because of realizing that fact. That he should have complied with the order of the seven-member bench of the Supreme Court would be accepted by him, contrary to the customs of the past, for the first time in history, the seven-member bench passed the order. Of the Supreme Court under which the Supreme Court judges and the Chief Justice of the High Courts, including temporary
