Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHEED versus MAQBOOL AHMED

Section 15 and 16 (2) of the eviction request The refusal of the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties to control the determination of such relationship was that the tenant had taken over the rent, but then the house The owner refused to buy it, in which case the premises had to be emptied and a sales contract had to be sued for certain performance, after which it would be given. In the case of easy access to the premises when they established relationships between the parties for the purposes of the jurisdiction of the rent controller, in the standing rent order the rent controller performed such exercises and The decision to uphold the relationship between the rent controller Supreme can never be made. The court passed the dismissal orders along with the court below and the High Court \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. GHULAM RASOOL 2011 SCMR 313
• ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, FORMER JUDGE/CJP v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN/STATE 2011 PLD 315
• MUNEEB AHMED KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 317
• Mst. NAJMA BEGUM v. REHMAT ALI 2011 SCMR 318
• AMIN ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 323
• NASEER AHMED SIDDIQUE v. AFTAB ALAM 2011 PLD 323
• IBRAHIM TRUST, KARACHI v. SHAHEEN FREIGHT SERVICES 2011 PLD 331
• EJAZ ALI BUGHTI v. P. T. C. L. 2011 SCMR 333

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes