Section 302 (b) and (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 340 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Article 185 (3) Defendant's Response to Evidence Evidence on the Oath, from the Trial Court The accused was convicted under Section 302 (b), the PPC sentenced him to death but the High Court changed the sentence to life imprisonment. The plea submitted by the accused was that his defense plea was not considered by the trial court. No woman was presented defensively from the house for injuries sustained by the prosecution's testimony, and the defendant's court held that he and the defendant were present at the time of the incident, so, if he No witness could testify in support. His request, he should have examined himself under Section 340 (2), CCPC, but he dismissed the defendant's request as an oath to support his defense request. Because it didn't create a report. In connection with the attack, if any, and since it did not appear under section 340 (2), the CRPC was administered under oath and to explain why the prosecutor's witness was injured. No prisoner at home was inspected, so no defense was requested. Based on conviction against the evidence of the prosecution and the plea of self-defense was unreasonable and unsupported, therefore, Section 302 (b), PPC to 302 (c) changed any of the accused's convictions. There was no substance, PPC Supreme Court refused to intervene and the accused was sentenced by a High Court leave for appeal.
