EVACUEE TRUST PROEPRTY BOARD THROUGH DEPUTY/ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY, PESHAWA versus ALI BAHADUR
In section 8 and 14 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the claimant jurisdiction of the section 42 eviction property demanded the civil court to declare the property as an equity trust property decision and the rights of the plaintiff by both courts Orders I approved were retained. Authenticity of the High Court Whenever there was a question about the status of a property, it was the Chairman of the ASOC Trust Property Board who, under the Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act 1975, made the decision and decision. Were able and empowered. Question: In view of the bar contained in section 14 of the Equity Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act 1975 by the civil court, the courts had no jurisdiction over the matter while the court considered and appreciated the evidence of the parties on record. It was concluded that the property had not been established. There was no commitment by the defendants to be associated with any charitable, religious beliefs, etc., and no vacancy was granted. In addition, the Chairman's exclusive domain and the court's decision to override his power and Therefore, the ban of section 14 of the Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975, attracted all court decisions and decisions. Was set aside below and dismissed due to non-availability of jurisdiction filed by the claimant.
