Find a Lawyer

MIR AFZAL KHAN versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) QTIL AMD evidence review incident occurred in daylight An FIR of unnecessary delay was filed The accused was specifically lodged an FIR. The conviction was also confirmed by the accused's convictions for nearly four-and-a-half years; the interrogation of the courts was not sought according to the evidence of the prosecutor, the appeal was dismissed. Was

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• HUMAN RIGHTS CASE NO.56878-P OF 2010 2011 PLD 163
• MUHAMMAD SALMAN SHAFIQUE v. State 2011 SCMR 165
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2011 SCMR 168
• Malik AQEEL v. State 2011 SCMR 170
• AYAZ AHMAD KHAN v. State 2011 PLD 171
• ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD BAKHSH 2011 SCMR 174
• QAISAR MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS 2011 PLD 174
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA v. State 2011 SCMR 176

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Lahore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes