Article 184 Human Rights Case Housing Scheme Launched. Due to complaints - allegations of dishonesty, fraud and malpractice and similar complaints against housing scheme sponsors were voiced by a large number of residents / owners and buyers of scheme plots. Regarding other such schemes which the Supreme Court raised in the matter of excluding the duties imposed on the Supreme Court under Article 184 of the Constitution, it is a matter of public importance, besides violating the fundamental rights of the people. To do and be involved. Some suites of housing schemes were not invasive in the realm, so that people had the power to restrict their schemes from local labor-related local authorities, such as development authorities, cantonment boards and other regulatory authorities. Take part in. And people were so caught up in it, to their horror, that the land on which such schemes were claimed was not developed by developers or under litigation and where the land was owned by such promoters, Then the promise is essential and essential facilities such as interior roads, public road connectivity and access, sewage, electricity and gas, etc. Whenever and wherever such fraud was committed, it was not only the sponsors of the respective schemes responsible for it, but also the relevant approvals and regulatory authorities who were equally responsible and responsible. The Supreme Court felt it. In the present case, but in some other cases, it appeared before the Supreme Court that the court was guilty of negligence of dishonest sponsors.
