Section 497 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161/409/420 bribery and bail fraud, Grant civil suit challan accused of further inquiry, accused Arrested on a charge of cheating. Prior to the transfer of some property in favor of him and his co-accused, the pre-arrest bail was canceled by the High Court, in favor of him and his co-accused, on behalf of the property side. Four civil suits were filed against each other. A verdict has already been given before the local civil court, and thus, considering any criminal intentions by the accused in this case before any final outcome of the trial, would be equivalent to putting the basket in front of the horse, An inquiry into the matter had already been finalized and the challan was in progress. The trial was presented in court, and as such, the investigating agency did not have to bring the accused into physical custody at which point the accused was deprived of his liberty in such a case only to seek revenge by the complaining party. There would be no beneficial motive for the suspect was involved in the investigation and nothing could be recovered from his arrest when he was charged with pre-arrest bail by the trial court. Misuse of bail exception or misuse and authorities did not seek to cancel his bail The trial court had granted the accused permission to grant bail before his arrest; therefore, the High Court did not cancel his bail. Should have done, and the High Court
