GHANI-UR-REHMAN versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Sections (d) and a (a) (v) of the property beyond known sources of income are re-examined by the plaintiff. The plaintiff was not summoned during the trial, the defendant's legal inheritance, under trial. A lawsuit was filed and he was convicted of possessing assets beyond known sources. He was ordered to confiscate all the assets in the name of Benedictine as his wife and sons and in the name of his beneficiary. And the sentence awarded by the trial court was upheld by the High Court, during the hearing of the appeal, the accused died and his legal Inheritance was enforced on appeal The sources of income of the accused were never brought on record by the litigation, nor was it ever verified at any stage of the trial by the trial court. Or its dependent persons or the so-called builders could not conclude the ownership or ownership of the assets, or the proprietor's wife was established as a proprietor of disproportionate resources and her sons' income. The trial court did not call for a hearing, giving NGS the opportunity to own the relevant assets From present evidence in support of their claims or to prove that they have enough resources to achieve their respective properties prosecution has not presented any evidence of your name before the trial court. Any misuse of any authority as the Chairman District Council or the Provincial Minister constitutes a mismatch between the misuse of their powers and the acquisition of wealth or the collection of assets by it.
