Section 2 30 b (b) / evidence 34 Joint Intention of Qatil-Im-Repressal Evidence Trial Court hearing the case of the main liability match has sentenced the accused to death on two counts and the same case was presented by the High Court. It was not clear to him. Evidence of who was shot in the accused. Property witnesses were not unusual with the accused and did not falsely impeach him. In the same account, eyewitnesses were told that all the assailants, including the accused, were injured in the shootings. Medical evidence, as a whole, from the ocular version of the prosecution proved that the investigating officer Had rescued the investigating officer from the scene of the incident and arrived the parcel of space at the forensic science laboratory office that same day. While the weapons were recovered eleven days after being sent to Parliament after being sent to Parliament, the office was evacuated to the relevant office Fore, according to the report of the Franzic Science Laboratory, the gun was fired from the recovered pistol on the suspect's identity. Of the thirteen bore pistols recovered from the scene of the incident, five were fired from the pistol, it was very difficult for the accused complainant and eyewitnesses to report each fire, which it was reported. What part of the victim's body was on fire when the accused and the accompanying accomplice opened fire indiscriminately? Once it was discovered that the accused persons jointly plan the same. In order to commit the crime, it was not a matter of who played the role, because the devil's responsibility was to
