Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT versus HAFIZ MUHAMMAD SAEED

Sections 3 and 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 185 ()) By order of the High Court, the release of deteno is permissible after the absence of any complaint against Ditto and his release from his participation in any activity. It would be sufficient to prove that someone could have been prevented because of this, changing the order of the High Court and ordering the defendant's detention based on orders passed by the authority more than a year ago. No legal bail will be granted: Prevention case no longer alive Supreme Court refuses to grant leave No!

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• TARIQ AZIZ-UD-DIN 2011 PLC(CS) 1130
• MUHAMMAD IKRAM v. State 2011 SCMR 1133
• JUNAID REHMAN v. State 2011 PLD 1135
• MUHAMMAD FAZAL v. SAEEDULLAH KHAN 2011 SCMR 1137
• SHABBIR AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1142
• GHANI-UR-REHMAN v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2011 PLD 1144
• MUHAMMAD JAMEEL AZEEM v. GHULAM SHABBIR 2011 SCMR 1145
• Sh. MUHAMMAD ABID v. State 2011 SCMR 1148

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Shangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes