Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL AZEEM versus GHULAM SHABBIR

Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 227 Qatim Um Alteration of the charge The former conditions recording trial court amended the charge during the trial, but the high court reversed the trial court's ruling that recording of some evidence Be done It was required before the change of charge that the Judicial Trial Court was capable of amending the tified allegations to justify the matter, under a condition that it should have been done before the judgment was rendered so that any prejudice to the accused person The possibility is gone. The PCR order rendered by the High Court was invalid, stating that the recording of any evidence would require recording before any modification of the charge was made as no provision was made in the provisions of section 227. And was kept separate. The trial court was reinstated and appeal was allowed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD FAZAL v. SAEEDULLAH KHAN 2011 SCMR 1137
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD SAEED 2011 SCMR 1139
• SHABBIR AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1142
• GHANI-UR-REHMAN v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2011 PLD 1144
• Sh. MUHAMMAD ABID v. State 2011 SCMR 1148
• MUMRAIZ v. State 2011 SCMR 1153
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2011 SCMR 1157
• Ch. ALI HASSAN v. PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1160

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

advocate for immigration from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes