Sections 302 (a) and 302 (b) of Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 17 Qatiel Ahmed re-examined the evidence of the original culprit as a permissible principle of tahsil shahud, the trial of the accused under the Inquiry Trial Court. Was sentenced to trial. 302 (a), the PPC and the like, were sentenced to death and upheld by the High Court. The exact case was the case of the single accused, who fired at the victim, therefore, the replacement of the culprit was not possible in the rare case where a witness whose close relative was killed was the accused with an innocent person. And thus allow the original suspect to go scot-free. The statements of the prosecution witnesses were completely serious with each other, and it is evident from their examination of the Chief and the cross-examination that no exercise was made by the trial court or the High Court to ascertain this. Whether the prosecution's witnesses met the need for a cleansed sesame honey, which required an inquiry. If the prosecution had succeeded in establishing the conviction of the late Qatal Ahmed, the accused under section 302 (a), PPC, was not required to be sentenced to death as the court imposed death or life imprisonment. Was given the power to punish Taz Ezar. Section 302 (6), the PPC Supreme Court upheld the sentence and the death sentence as a prisoner was changed to death sentence because Ta Azir's appeal was dismissed.
