Constitution of Pakistan, Section 185 (3) amount of bail, the arrest of the applicants belonging to the jurisdiction is the guarantee of the accused who was released on bail by the High Court, but he later absent himself from the applicant. Started trial against Section 514 CCPC. In this regard, the Supreme Court has expressed great concern over the law and order situation in the ownership of securities and the deterioration of moral values in the society during the three / four decades that the provisions of section 514, CR PC not only strictly adhered to. Must be paragraph. The absence of a guaranteed bail should therefore be blamed for confiscating the entire amount of its bonds because the moral values of society that were in the sixties were different. Then when the court allowed the accused to bail with the condition that he would present the bail on bail. A certain amount of money through bail and if such bail fails to present the accused, if required by the court, there is a softening of the CA's failure to produce the bail is equivalent to violating the law. And will encourage the non-production of guarantees allowed based on the bonds offered by the guarantees. Both the applicants had a deep connection with the two accused, and yet it was impossible for them. Knowing the facts of cancellation of the accused's bail by the Supreme Court, the accused were declared invalid and the applicants (bailouts) did not hesitate to get their attendance as the Supreme Court wanted and the trial court's petitioner Supreme. Failed to present a case for court intervention. Yep
