Section 302 (b) Convention of Conduct (10 of 1984), Section 129 (g) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Evidence Remedies Prosecution Evidence, Impact Medical and Molecular Evidence Improvement Increase Disposition of Injured Witness The principles of the two accused were sent to trial, one was sentenced by the trial court and sentenced to death and the other was acquitted, but the high court acquitted the other accused too, strengthening the prosecution's case. During the court hearing, his statements were improved. The improvement raised serious doubts about the truth of such witnesses, therefore, the High Court was justified in concluding that such statements were not reliable and the High Court was also justified in concluding that the medical The evidence contradicts the molecular evidence. The reliance on such general testimony was unsafe, the recovery was also ignored solely by the rioters for injuries sustained during the incident but they were not presented by the prosecution for no good reason, therefore, the High Court Was justified in assuming that if the injured person was presented, he did not support the prosecution's case, that in order to increase the sentence, the order under the appeal should be either dismissed or denied or without. The Supreme Court, for no good reason, acquitted the accused and did not see any illegal motions by the High Court as he observed. After all, the application of intelligence was acquitted and after considering every evidence, the Supreme Court did not find anything weak or illegal. His finding of innocence recorded by the High Court regarding the accused's departure for appeal
