ADMINISTRATOR/PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY KARACHI versus GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAN
Article 185 (3) The scope of natural justice, the civil justice fresh action, the principles of departmental action against civil servants were set aside by the service tribunal and the decision was upheld by the Supreme Court, after which the authorities Again the proceedings on the same charge, which was an action the High Court set aside in relation to the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, were raised by the government officials, which was that government employees had a process against the new justification. Was once set up by the Service Tribunal to set aside proceedings against a civil servant and the Supreme Court on the facts. The decision was not interfered with by the court; there was no chance of retaliation against the accused again. Such action by the authorities was against the principles of natural justice. Launching the latest action did not mean that a public servant should be prosecuted again on the same charges that were not found to be correct in the previous proceedings. If there were allegations earlier that the allegations on which the public servant's service was terminated, the High Court properly exercised jurisdiction, therefore, no interference was sought on the leave request for appeal.
