MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
R15 Office Establishment of Federal Ombudsman Order (PO 1 of 1983), Article 32 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution Petition Judiciary, Applicable Rules for different relief decisions Appellants were successful in the competitive examination but were not satisfied with the allotted group for constitutional application and the intra-court appeal was dismissed concurrently on the basis of sanctions under judicial rule. Different, therefore, the High Court erred in excluding the Petition on Reese Judesta rule. The High Court upheld the judge's order in the Chamber of the High Court without accepting the clauses of constitutional petitions. The decision passed by the High Court's Division Bench was a permissible decision, as evidenced by the claimant's claim clause in the constitutional petition, appellant challenged vi in the second round of litigation that reacted to the Federal Ombudsman's order on his complaint. Was approved and the president's order was also passed on his representation, while in the first round of litigation, appellants challenged the strings of the Public Service Commission's recommendations by a division bench of the High Court. Do not bring in notice, the person born in two sessions of litigation by the Division Bench of the High Court As it was not in accordance with the law presented in various Supreme Court decisions, the Supreme Court set aside the judgment passed by the Division Bench. The matter was remanded to the High Court for a decision of the High Court and Intro Court of Appeal, after which the appeal was allowed.
