Article VIII of the Scheduled Muslim Family Law Ordinance (61 19 19), the Pakistan Constitution's Article 199 Constitution Petition for Dover Recovery, from the Registered Marriage Scope Suit on the Treatment of Marriage Registration in Marriage Registration Registration The affidavit was registered by the trial court and the appellate court upheld it. The wife's opinion was that both the courts below had shown the contents of the marriage contract incorrectly, according to which Rs two lakh, one hundred tola gold and the house Dura was appointed as respondent. / The husband requested that the entries mentioned in the marriage were forged, defaulted and the marriage of the sex offender registrar was a public document filed under the provisions of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 and so on. He was associated with. According to the same law, four copies of the marriage were prepared, one of which was K by the marriage registrar, the other sent to the concerned municipal corporation or union council, the third copy was given to the bride and the fourth one was given to the bride. The point behind providing copies to the concerned people was that each party could verify these entries. The marriage contract stipulates that according to the terms of the marriage between the two, if the respondents / husband believed that the Nika registrar had interfered with the registration of the Nika register, he could refer to the Deputy Commissioner, who is the controlling authority and he would make the same correction. But they did not bother to take advantage of this remedy against the alleged outbreak in the marriage. Both of the courts below have applied the applicant's / wife's jurisdiction wrongly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
