Articles 2 302, Q4 and Q 34 abduction or abduction for murder, the definition of common intention evidence, the delay of fifteen days in the filing of the FIR, had cast serious doubts on the fact of the prosecution case. The evidence seen, presented as a later thought, did not affect confidence. And it wasn't safe to rely on last-look evidence. And it could not be used against charges that he had retained his sentence on a capital charge, evidence of extra-judicial confession presented by the prosecution's witnesses was not reliable, the prosecutor allegedly recovered arms, The knife and buggy failed to prove the motive behind the incident. With the positive report of the Chemical Examiner and serologist, the suspect's example was sent to the relevant offices, only about two months after the incident, the remote possibility of blood both said that the articles were present and that it was not safe to rely on pieces of evidence. Was. In the circumstances of the prosecution case, the body of the deceased was seized from a water course 24 days ago. The accused was entitled to doubt, not as a matter of grace, but as a trial sentence. The accused was sentenced by an unprovoked verdict, set aside, the accused was acquitted of a previous charge, taken advantage of the doubt, and released from the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
