Article 948Unf Laws of Evidence (of 1984 of the X), Constitution of Arts 59 and 84 of Pakistan, Arts 10A & 1993 Constitutional application unlawfully issue a check Comparison of expert opinion signatures Rights of trial I had to face the applicant's dishonesty for issuing a bank. The applicant refused to issue a check due to his withdrawal on the presentation and his request to obtain a comparison of his signature on the check from the Handwriting Expert: With the dismissal by the trial court, the trial court Appeal Court's Nullity Power Self-Check Comparison, under Article 84 of the Law Evidence, 1984, disputes relating to the signature of the complainant (applicant), for sending a check for fingerprint expert competition Trial of trial not canceled, expert evidence, testimony of law, 1984 article The evidence under L-59 was admissible. , And if such evidence was not available, then the trial court could only compare itself with the KPK's signed signature of the petitioner petitioner's refusal to send it by the trial court in view of Article 10A, Was entitled to a fair trial: Conflict with fingerprint express, evidence of law, violation of 1984 trial court provisions also failed Lower Appellate Court to exercise their jurisdiction under the law and unlawful by the petitioner As the application was dismissed, which was allowed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
