Find a Lawyer

RAJA KHAN versus MANAGER (OPERATION) FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (WAPDA)

Article 34 and Constitution 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article ??2 ()) Revoking a First-Time Appeal from a Service-Retirement Appeal is not prohibited because the service tribunal qualifies as well as the time of its imprisonment. Is not banned. The applicant had filed an appeal before the Tribunal in connection with the limitation without fulfilling the requirement of Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. The court could not reach the limitation agreement during the four years of service. Was punished while the applicants were punished eight times after that. Practitioner accepted his retirement sentence by claiming his pension and monthly pension was regularly refused by the Supreme Court on leave of appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Syed MAZHAR HAIDER KAZMI v. SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 671
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2011 PLD 671
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islama v. Dr. MUBASHIR HASSAN 2011 PLD 674
• Dr. MUHAMMAD SHAHID MIAN v. FAIZ-UR-REHMAN FAIZI 2011 PLD 676
• JUSTICE HASNAT AHMED KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN/STATE 2011 PLD 680
• REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE v. Malik RIAZ AHMAD KHOKHAR 2011 PLC(CS) 681
• GHULAM SHABBIR AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 683
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2011 PLC(CS) 683

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes