In section 302 (b) of the Conan testimony (10 of 1984), the re-arrest of the accused was not known to the prosecution's witnesses before the accused identified the victim and was described only by features, two years later. The prosecution witnesses saw the accused for a short time and did not identify him during the identification parade but was identified at the recording of his statement in court effect because his Such identification was meaningless because by then the accused was known for prosecution. As witnesses, the only evidence was that the suspect had a clear mark on his forehead that could be easily identified. The other suspect complained before police to hand over two photographs of the suspect in the presence of their prosecutor's witnesses, which threatened to confirm the identity test. No one could be convicted or punished until the identity of the prosecution could prove the identity of the accused without a suspect being established as a co-accused, therefore, the apex court pronounced the accused a death sentence and He was acquitted of the charge under section 302 (b); the appeal of the PPC was allowed
