Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Application No. 383 of '1970 decided on 14th January 197,1.
‑Dismissal of application under S. 34 due to non‑appear ance of petitioner or his authorised representative‑Order of Labour Court final under S. 37(4) and not appealable.
Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi who claimed to be the representative of the petitioner when he appeared in this Court on the 18th of December 1970, is not present in the Court today despite repeated calls. The petitioner is also absent from this Court today without any reasonable cause although a notice was sent to him for appearing in this Court today. It is already 2‑45 p.m. today and I can see no reason for waiting any longer for either the petitioner or Mr. Abdul Majid Qureshi. The latter has not filed any special power of attorney on judicial paper bearing the signature of the petitioner. 'For all the above recorded reasons, especially the absence of the petitioner himself without any reasonable cause, this application (under section 34 of the industrial' Relations Ordinance, 1969) is dismissed. In view of the provisions of subsection 4 of section 37 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, this deci sion of the Labour Court, Central Zone, Lahore, "shall be final and shall not be called in question in any manner by or before any'
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer