Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 Application pending before the Labor Court This request should not be retained, requesting the workers to appeal the decision to appeal, not qualified

1972 P L C 160

[Punjab Labour Court]

Before Mahmood Ahmad Soofi, Chairman and Fazal Elahi Qurban, Member

MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Versus

PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE

Application No. 343 of 1970, decided on 16th December 1970.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 34 --

Application lying pending before Labour Court‑Workman filing fresh application praying for direction to employer to decide his appeal‑Such application, held, not maintainable.

Mian Amir‑ud‑Din for Respondent.

ORDER

MAHMOOD AHMAD SOON (CHAIRMAN)

.‑The respondent's represen tative has filed his reply to the petitioner's application. The argu ments of both parties have been beard by me today. The petitioner Muhammad Aslam has already filed an application under section 34 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 against the Order of dismissal doted 13th June 1970 passed by the District Manager, Government Transport Service, Multan, against the petitioner. The case is pending in this Labour Court and has already been fixed for the date 1st January 1971, for the arguments of both parties in regard' to the merits of the case. In view of this circumstance the present application of the petitioner, which also purports to have been instituted in this Court under section 34 of the same Ordinance and which contains the petitioner's prayer for an order of this Court directing the respondent to record a decision immediately in regard to an appeal filed by the petitioner before the respondent against the respondent's impugned order, A dated 13th June 1970, is not maintainable under any provisions of the relevant law. Consequently dais Application (No. 343 of 1970) is dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Hattar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.