AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.IV
Sections 41 and 55 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance (VII of 1968), the Section O20 Complaint petition were filed by the employer against the Labor and Court-approved Labor Relations decision. The petitioner, who had heard the petition filed by the applicant, was accepted and ordered to be reinstated in full employment with full benefits. The applicant, who did not have any documents to establish the employer's job, admitted in his interim examination that he was not an employee of the complaint filed by the applicant. Against the employer, the ground was unable to be sustained on the Labor Court that the applicant was not an employee of the employer, but rather of the contractor, he ordered the employer to ensure that the labor court order was entered into by the contractor. Be enforced. There is no such obligation. Permission was granted as the contractor in the Labor Court was enforced as one of the respondents at Apple. Thus, the Employer Industrial and Commercial Employment Standing Ordinance, 1968, stood against Standing Order 20, a separate legal entity. None of the approved orders could be bound because there was no evidence that the applicant was employed by the employer. The labor court's decision by the contractor, in the circumstances, was set aside
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2011
