ENGRO FERTILIZERS LIMITED (FORMERLY ENGRO CHEMICAL PAKISTAN LTD. versus RASHEED AHMED KOLACHI
Sections 41, 54 (3) and 55 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O15, 15 Complaint for dismissal of employment after the employee has submitted a charge sheet and charge sheet against them. Dismissed from employment Employees filed a complaint against the employment dismissal order after serving a complaint notice, on charges of unintentional absence of duty for more than ten days, and further allegations of unlawful use and discrepancies in stock. Also checked the employees. But after that, both the lawyer and the employer disappeared from the Labor Court, neither did they present any evidence, nor did any of the progress arguments be made by the Labor Court, based on the evidence available on the record, and concluded. That the employee is entitled to a job reimbursement with back-up benefits The Labor Court, although fully concluded in favor of the employee, but as a precautionary measure, the court ordered employers / management within a period of three months. Inquiries were allowed to resume within the inquiry The impeachment order was complied with to the extent of restoration and inquiry, but the inquiry Being subject to the maintenance of discipline, going back to employee benefits were not payable
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2011
