Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATION), PAKISTAN RAILWAY HEADQUARTER OFFICE, LAHORE

Section 19 Service Removal (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 3 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 retires from employment on obtaining retirement pension benefits at the age of 60, but The pensionary benefits were withheld by the unconstitutional order that the verdict in a criminal case against the appellant is subject to adjournment and the appellant's pensionary benefits are his own, and without notice to the authorities for any reason. The pensioner had no right to receive arrears against a retired employee and nothing was on record to give him an opportunity to defend himself. A notice was sent to the appellant that the appellant's pension could not be withheld under which the appellant's pensionary benefits were withheld, he was put aside under which the authorities were directed to pay. Pension to the applicant within one month

Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2012

• NAEEM IQBAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan 2012 PLC(CS) 184
• Mst. SAJIDA SHAIKH v. DEPUTY POST MASTER GENERAL, NORTHERN SINDH CIRCLE POSTAL SERVICES, HYDERABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 189
• Syed ABRAR HUSSAIN v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 197
• NOOR-UL-KHITAB v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner 2012 PLC(CS) 203
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2012 PLC(CS) 214
• ABDUL RAFEEQ MUGHAL v. GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATIONS), PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2012 PLC(CS) 246
• SOHAIL KHAN v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC(CS) 277
• AFTAB MEHDI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Prime Minister 2012 PLC(CS) 280

All Federal Service Tribunal judgments of 2012 →

property advocates from Moro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes