Find a Lawyer

M.YAHYA M. YOUSAF BARI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD

A complaint was filed against the department for failure to devise a mechanism for claiming the return of special excise duty (section ED) paid under section 3A of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, Which led to more delays in resolving the refund claim. From July 2007 to December 2009, the complainant stated that no special procedure had been devised by the Federal Board of Revenue, enabling him to file a return claim for the system. The system was delayed in order to obtain a claim for return on duty, which is equivalent to corruption. Under section 2 (3) (ii) of the establishment of the Office of the Federal Ombudsman Ordinance, the 2000 Ombudsman instructed the Federal Board of Revenue Chief Commissioner to delay the filing of the complainant's special excise duty claim. Sorry Issue a lawful refund with compliance within 21 days and report compliance within the next 7 days

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012

• BILAL SAEED v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 437
• ALANDICK AND COMPANY LTD., ISLAMABAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 439
• UROOJ TEXTILES v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 445
• LAL GHEE AND OIL MILLS MALAKAND AGENCY v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 449
• UMER SHAHID Proprietor U.S. Motors, Lahore v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 463
• MUMTAZ HUSSAIN MIAN v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 475
• AAMIR RIAZ v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 495
• POLY PACK (PVT.) LTD. v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 524

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2012 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Lahore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes