AAMIR RIAZ versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Complainant's claim against the refund of the lost R67 was that he had offered a bid of Rs 2,400,000 during the auction of the vehicle and as the highest bidder, he had bid. Rolls Complaint alleges that the auctioning authority not only delivered the underground vehicle to it, but also deposited the amount deposited by the auction authority. Also confiscated the department representative's admission that the highest bidder submitted by the complainant was Rs. 42,50,000 on the bid recording sheet and the complainant. According to Dah, who needed Rs 1,062,500, equivalent to 25% of the bid amount but had deposited Rs 600,000 as per the documentary evidence presented by the highest bid department representative 4,250 The amount was less than Rs. 1,062,500, ie 25 amount of the bid amount was not acceptable to accept the partial payment of the base amount; If the hammer failed to collect the full amount of base money soon after the collapse, the bid should be canceled according to the provisions of R 67 of the Customs Rules 2001. The high bidder's rule was violated without violation of R-67 without prompt payment of the balance due. The non-receipt of receipt and the seizure of the partial money was unfair. Irresponsibility states that setting up the Office of the Federal Ombudsman Ordinance was a misdemeanor action under Section 2 (3) of discharging powers and commissioning, prompting the 2000 Federal Board of Revenue.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
