UROOJ TEXTILES versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
The collector of the company's complaint against the Section 45 malicious assistant collector sales tax reported to the collector sales tax that the complainant failed to produce a sales tax record for audit, it is assumed despite several reminders. That the complainant is involved in issuing counterfeit and flying receipts without the physical transfer of the goods. To facilitate the return of counterfeit money, a showcase notice was issued in which the complainant was instructed not to fail to appear on the due date and to hear the same on different dates later, so they were given a hearing. I was blacklisted for failing to attend and submitting record for audit representative. The Complainant's statement states that the manufacturing unit was moved to another premises by applying for such a change in registration details on the prescribed format and was told that the premises for regular change of premises The new address is allowed by the Board of Revenue, according to the complainant, he was physically available. His blacklisting in the Federal Board of Revenue was sent to the wrong address, showing notice and hearing of the unfair and illegal show. The complainant had no knowledge of the notices issued by the department and was Could not benefit from the right to explain. The complainant could not be retained. The complaint was unjustifiably condemned, and because of the department's error, this action was equivalent to corruption pursuant to Section 2 (3) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance. , 2000 was the Federal Board of Revenue Cell
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
