MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sections 4 and 17 (4) Ordinance of Companies (XLVII of 1984), Sections 30, 31, 32, 451 and 452 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 Writ Petition Property Acquisition Public Purpose Scope Notification Property owners were challenged by the property owners to construct a power project through a company-issued company (applicants). The owners said the company was a non-state article and registered in Azad Jammu and Kashmir. No, the acquisition of property for such a company was neither lawful nor obtainable for public purpose. Weldetti Term Company means the 1984 certificate issued by the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, a company registered under the Companies Ordinance, disclosing that the Company had provided the required documents under Section 30. Companies Ordinance, 31, 32 and 451 of 1984; and thereafter the acquisition of land was taken in favor of the company. Once a company has been registered after meeting the requirements of the proceedings it cannot be said that the company is a non-state subject for which land was being acquired for the company. Even though the acquisition was in the public interest, the process was being taken in favor of the company, but it was said that the project would be given to the Azad Jammu and Kashmir government dispute that the company was not a state subject, therefore, The related company had also stated. In a written statement explaining their status as a Contractor / Lease. They will only use the project for 35 years. Under the default tariff payment to the Independent Government, the applicants believe that the property acquired for the company is a misunderstanding.
