Sections 4, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 54 Determination of the amount of compensation by the referee court, as assessed by the collector land and the amount of the compensation received by the referee court. The referee's court was raising the amount of compensation, declaring that the land granted was of potential / commercial value and that it was located on the main road within the municipal limits if the demand for compensation as well as the potential for landowner land If the value is proved, then it is disclosed only and according to the record of the compensation which the Collector has estimated. The market value of the acquired village was not mentioned in the market and Friday's potential value of the acquired land was mentioned in the award, but did not consider the market value of the acquired land as per the above-mentioned sales practices. Located on the road and had the benefit. The respectable probable compensation was based on the market determined by the referee court and the probable value, which recorded its discovery based on stable and enthusiastic reasons presented by the owners of the acquired land by the witnesses, There was full support for the version that was accepted. The referee court's documentary evidence confirmed to the owners which version was rejected by the acquiring authorities in view of the value of the acquired land in any way before the referee court evidence presented by the owners. Did not mention anything illegal or illegal. The collector's review was self-contradictory, while tracking the value of the acquired land,
