Find a Lawyer

SALAT versus WADI HUSSAIN

A. XLI, R 27 Applicants to the Court of Appeal of Extra Evidence had already included a copy of the record of rights with the original case but wanted to keep a copy of the record of rights records for the same year, but as such To fill in the gaps in their evidence with the latest document required with the new entries, Valdity Parties could not be allowed to draw on the weaker sections of their case or the appellate court to raise new points recorded their findings. That were based on a valid and reasonable reason for rejecting the application. Appeal additional evidence High Court refuses to interfere in findings of appellate court

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2012

• URFAN QURESHI v. Chaudhary SHOUKAT AZIZ 2012 CLC 1887
• Dr. EJAZ AHMED v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2012 YLR 1914
• PERVEZ IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2012 CLC 1933
• SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WAPDA v. LAAB BIBI 2012 YLR 2283
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2012 PLD 1
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. SHAMIM AKHTAR 2012 PLD 14
• Mian MUMTAZ AKHTAR v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL SECRETARIAT through Secretary 2012 PLD 28
• KHALIDA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD RASHID KHAN 2012 PLD 34

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Larkana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes