Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXXX, grant of permanent injunction grant and suit for interim injunction cancellation, the plaintiff filed a separate application for interim injunction, which was allowed by the trial court. The defendants' appellate court upheld the trial court's decision that a few years ago the municipality was built by the municipality for the benefit of the general public, including the plaintiff, all owners of the village left the land for the construction of the street people Was. The area had been using this road for the last five to six years, the plaintiff had also given up some land to construct the aforementioned road, but later made it to the Road Trial Court to inspect the land in dispute and make a report. Local Commission appointed For the same commission, a report was made after the inspection and no objection was raised before the trial court regarding the appointment by the plaintiff. The complainant's report to the commission, which also participated in the construction of the aforesaid roadway for road safety, said the road plaintiff did not seek to declare ownership of the land in the case over the controversial land. Therefore, he could not receive any relief from a permanent or interim injunction if the plaintiff was not willing to give up his land for the construction of the road, he was entitled to claim his land compensation from the relevant authorities. Was. Was deleted
