RAJA SHAH NAWAZ KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sections 9 (b), 13 and 29 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 44, written zakat and formation of city council and appointment of council chairman, salaries and other privileges were suspended. The chairman respondents implemented the zakat and city council through notification and the applicant was appointed chairman of the council, in which the petitioner requested that the former chairman be paid equal to the salary of the High Court judge, Other concessions were granted, so they could be granted similar concessions to the applicant. He claimed that the Prime Minister had passed a summary in this regard, which was lying in the office of the Chief Secretary, who had not taken any initiative to issue a formal notification and on the occasion of his writ petition, the authorities The accompanying notification issued by the Consolidated Pay Salary, and the applicant challenged the strings of the notification issued by the WEA ?? Malicious and petitioner opposed the Prime Minister's approval. That was because no formal notification was issued in light of the Prime Minister's approval. A directive should be issued to implement the Prime Minister's approval. The applicant's primary complaint relates to the failure of the Prime Minister's approval, whereby his terms and conditions were allegedly determined by the Prime Minister's alleged approval that the applicant was in accordance with salaries and demands. , It was never approved and only the privileges of the former chairman of the petitioner were allowed to claim that he was a High Court judge.
