A VII, R 11 trial on the charge of dismissal of the trial and a permanent injunction dismissed by the Scope Trial Court on the ground that it was not sustained because of the cause of action. And below, the appellate court, after the trial, filed a lawsuit alleging the plaintiff in the trial court's case, including the case, that the plaintiff had cheated on him The yogurt was committed because of any sale process, but the sale agreement on the suit property was put into operation because of the amount of money spent to send her son overseas. As the plaintiff also pleaded that she knew about the fraud a month before the institution of the case. It cannot be said of any imagination that the plaintiff has not shown any reason for the proceedings; both the courts, in the circumstances, failed to attend the legal provisions contained in VII, R11, CPC and the case. The deletion order was not approved. In the case of settling the issue on the basis of the statute of limitations under the law, if it was not a pure question of law, it was also wrong that the unanimous decisions of the courts were set aside and prosecuted. The trial court was remanded for. Matter by law
